…
…
ROE = tax × interest × margin × turnover × leverage
| FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tax burden | 6.97x | 3.10x | 0.98x | 0.77x | 0.84x |
| Interest burdendriver | 0.24x | 0.26x | 0.49x | 0.59x | 0.61x |
| Operating margin | 12.6% | 12.5% | 18.2% | 19.4% | 19.1% |
| Asset turnover | 0.50x | 0.41x | 0.45x | 0.49x | 0.48x |
| Leverage (equity mult.) | 6.15x | 3.62x | 3.40x | 3.12x | 3.00x |
| = Return on Equity (consolidated) | 65.5% | 15.1% | 13.4% | 13.4% | 13.9% |
| Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) | 9.8% | 7.5% | 11.1% | 9.6% | 10.1% |
Consolidated (pre-minority-interest) basis; the headline ROE in the ratio grid is owners’ basis.
| FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio(Current Assets / Current Liabilities) | 0.40x | 0.52x | 0.45x | 0.48x | 0.62x |
| Quick Ratio((Current Assets − Inventory) / Current Liabilities) | 0.40x | 0.52x | 0.45x | 0.48x | 0.62x |
| Cash Ratio(Cash / Current Liabilities) | 0.13x | 0.27x | 0.15x | 0.14x | 0.17x |
| Working Capital(Current Assets − Current Liabilities) | -Rp 17 T | -Rp 17 T | -Rp 19 T | -Rp 16 T | -Rp 11 T |
| FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt to Equity (DER)(Total Debt / Total Equity) | 3.29x | 1.78x | 1.60x | 1.50x | 1.39x |
| Liabilities to Equity(Total Liabilities / Total Equity) | 5.15x | 2.62x | 2.40x | 2.12x | 2.00x |
| Debt to Assets(Total Debt / Total Assets) | 0.53x | 0.49x | 0.47x | 0.48x | 0.46x |
| Net Debt(Total Debt − Cash) | Rp 30 T | Rp 46 T | Rp 49 T | Rp 50 T | Rp 50 T |
| Interest Coverage(EBIT / Interest Expense) | 1.32x | 1.35x | 1.98x | 2.42x | 2.57x |
| Equity Multiplier (Assets ÷ Equity) | 6.15x | 3.62x | 3.40x | 3.12x | 3.00x |
| FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin(Gross Profit / Revenue) | 59.5% | 50.1% | 54.4% | 56.1% | 55.0% |
| Operating Margin(EBIT / Revenue) | 12.6% | 12.5% | 18.2% | 19.4% | 19.1% |
| Net Margin(Net Income / Revenue) | 21.5% | 10.1% | 8.8% | 8.8% | 9.7% |
| EBITDA(EBIT + D&A) | Rp 12 T | Rp 14 T | Rp 18 T | Rp 21 T | Rp 21 T |
| EBITDA Margin(EBITDA / Revenue) | 37.7% | 31.0% | 35.5% | 36.7% | 37.2% |
| Return on Assets (ROA)(Net Income / Total Assets) | 10.6% | 4.2% | 3.9% | 4.3% | 4.6% |
| Return on Equity (ROE)(Net Income (Owners) / Equity (Owners)) | 73.5% | 16.7% | 14.7% | 14.7% | 15.2% |
| Tax Burden (Net ÷ Pretax) | 6.97x | 3.10x | 0.98x | 0.77x | 0.84x |
| Interest Burden (Pretax ÷ EBIT) | 0.24x | 0.26x | 0.49x | 0.59x | 0.61x |
| Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) | 9.8% | 7.5% | 11.1% | 9.6% | 10.1% |
| Turnover | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover(Revenue / Total Assets) | 0.50x | 0.41x | 0.45x | 0.49x | 0.48x |
| Inventory Turnover(COGS / Inventory) | 702.01x | 318.36x | 103.10x | 342.01x | 470.09x |
| Receivables Turnover(Revenue / Receivables) | 15.48x | 20.04x | 16.32x | 17.11x | 15.70x |
| Payables Turnover(COGS / Payables) | 12.95x | 27.46x | 31.30x | 26.94x | 21.05x |
| Conversion Period | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Days Inventory Outstanding (DIO)(365 × Inventory / COGS) | 0.5 days | 1.1 days | 3.5 days | 1.1 days | 0.8 days |
| Days Sales Outstanding (DSO)(365 × Receivables / Revenue) | 23.6 days | 18.2 days | 22.4 days | 21.3 days | 23.3 days |
| Days Payable Outstanding (DPO)(365 × Payables / COGS) | 28.2 days | 13.3 days | 11.7 days | 13.6 days | 17.3 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC)(DIO + DSO − DPO) | -4.1 days | 6.1 days | 14.2 days | 8.9 days | 6.7 days |
| FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free Cash Flow(Operating Cash Flow − Capex) | Rp 1.6 T | Rp 5.3 T | Rp 5.9 T | Rp 6.6 T | Rp 9.2 T |
Price Rp 1,900 · market cap Rp 61 T
| Multiple | ISAT | Peer median | vs median |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 11.12x | 12.86x(2/3) | -14% |
| P/B | 1.69x | 1.69x | 0% |
| P/S | 1.08x | 1.08x | 0% |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.44x | 5.44x | 0% |
| EV/EBIT | 10.61x | 9.83x(2/3) | +8% |
| EV/Sales | 2.02x | 2.18x | -7% |
| FCF Yield | 15.00% | 15.76% | -5% |
| Dividend Yield | 4.41% | 8.08% | -45% |
Only 3 peers are covered here, so the median is itself one of the members. A 0% gap can simply mean ISAT sits at the median.
EV = mkt cap Rp 61 T + debt Rp 55 T − cash Rp 5.1 T + minority interest Rp 3.2 T = Rp 114 T
At today’s price, the market is paying for 7.7%/yr FCF growth (4.6% at 12.0% to 10.5% at 16.0% discount rates). Delivered over the last 4 years: 55.4% FCF · 15.8% revenue.
Reverse DCF: single-stage FCF, terminal growth 2.5%, discount band 12.0–16.0% (β=1; build cited in Methodology). Not a forecast.
This model projects the operating cash the whole business generates, discounts it back at the blended cost of capital, and subtracts net debt. What remains is the equity value, stated per share. Every input below comes from the company's own audited record or from cited market data, and you can adjust each one yourself.
Base year contains named one-off item(s): FY2022: Network merger closed at the start of 2022 and reset the entire balance sheet; FY2021: Net margin above operating margin, indicating a material non-operating gain. The EBIT basis screens out most non-operating items, but read the Earnings Quality section before trusting the base margin.
| Assumption | Value | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Rf (risk-free) | 7.26% | Indonesia 10Y government bond, 8 Jul 2026 |
| ERP (Rm − Rf) | 6.69% | Damodaran Indonesia, Jul 2026 (Baa2, CRP 2.46%) |
| β | 0.37 → 0.65 | Telecom. Services (unlevered) relevered at own D/E 0.90 |
| Cost of equity | 11.59% | Rf + β × ERP |
| Cost of debt | 7.63% | FY2025 interest expense ÷ total debt |
| Tax rate | 16.3% | median effective rate, FY2021–FY2025 (pretax ≈ EBIT − interest) |
| WACC | 9.13% | 53% E × CoE + 47% D × Kd × (1 − t) |
| Revenue growth (yr 1, fading) | 15.8% | delivered 4-yr revenue CAGR 15.8%, fading linearly to terminal |
| EBIT margin | 18.9% | mean EBIT margin, last 3 FYs |
| D&A / revenue | 17.6% | mean D&A/revenue, last 3 FYs |
| Capex / revenue | 22.4% | mean capex/revenue, last 3 FYs, for the explicit years; in the terminal year capex falls to replacement level (equal to depreciation, 17.6% of revenue) because holding a build-phase or pause-phase ratio in perpetuity misprices the company in whichever direction that phase points |
| ΔNWC / Δrevenue | 3.2% | median ΔNWC/Δrevenue across the seeded years (NWC = AR + inventory − AP) |
| Terminal growth | 2.5% | BI inflation-target midpoint (2.5% ± 1%) |
| Year | +1 | +2 | +3 | +4 | +5 | T∞ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.8% | 12.5% | 9.2% | 5.8% | 2.5% | 2.5% |
| Revenue | Rp 65 T | Rp 74 T | Rp 80 T | Rp 85 T | Rp 87 T | Rp 89 T |
| EBIT | Rp 12 T | Rp 14 T | Rp 15 T | Rp 16 T | Rp 16 T | Rp 17 T |
| NOPAT | Rp 10 T | Rp 12 T | Rp 13 T | Rp 13 T | Rp 14 T | Rp 14 T |
| + D&A | Rp 11 T | Rp 13 T | Rp 14 T | Rp 15 T | Rp 15 T | Rp 16 T |
| − Capex | Rp 15 T | Rp 17 T | Rp 18 T | Rp 19 T | Rp 20 T | Rp 16 T |
| − ΔNWC | Rp 288 M | Rp 263 M | Rp 217 M | Rp 151 M | Rp 68 M | Rp 70 M |
| FCFF | Rp 6.9 T | Rp 7.8 T | Rp 8.6 T | Rp 9.2 T | Rp 9.5 T | Rp 14 T |
| PV | Rp 6.3 T | Rp 6.6 T | Rp 6.6 T | Rp 6.5 T | Rp 6.1 T | Rp 137 T |
Check it yourself: revenue × margin = EBIT · NOPAT = EBIT × (1 − tax) · FCFF = NOPAT + D&A − Capex − ΔNWC · PV = FCFF ÷ (1+WACC)^yr · TV = FCFF(T∞) ÷ (WACC − g), discounted from year 5
EV = PV(explicit) Rp 32 T + PV(TV) Rp 137 T = Rp 169 T · TV 81% of EV · − net debt Rp 50 T − minority Rp 3.2 T
Model output: Rp 3,597/share (+89% vs price Rp 1,900)· exit-multiple check (5.4x): Rp 2,816
Under these assumptions the model lands 89% above today's price. The market, in other words, is paying for slower growth, a thinner margin, or a higher discount rate than the inputs here assume.
| g \ WACC | 8.1% | 9.1% | 10.1% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0% | 4,108 | 3,233 | 2,577 |
| 2.5% | 4,615 | 3,597 | 2,849 |
| 3.0% | 5,220 | 4,020 | 3,160 |
Model output under the stated assumptions. Every input above comes from the company's own audited record or from cited market data, and every one can be adjusted. This is not a price target and not advice.
Educational analysis. Multiples pair today’s price with the latest audited fiscal year (trailing-FY convention); peer figures are the covered peer sample, not the whole market. Never a price target.
| FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | Rp 31 T | Rp 47 T | Rp 51 T | Rp 56 T | Rp 57 T |
| Cost of Goods Sold | Rp 13 T | Rp 23 T | Rp 23 T | Rp 25 T | Rp 25 T |
| Gross Profit | Rp 19 T | Rp 23 T | Rp 28 T | Rp 31 T | Rp 31 T |
| Operating Income (EBIT) | Rp 4.0 T | Rp 5.9 T | Rp 9.3 T | Rp 11 T | Rp 11 T |
| Interest Expense | Rp 3.0 T | Rp 4.3 T | Rp 4.7 T | Rp 4.5 T | Rp 4.2 T |
| Net Income | Rp 6.8 T | Rp 4.7 T | Rp 4.5 T | Rp 4.9 T | Rp 5.5 T |
| Net Income Attributable to Owners | Rp 6.8 T | Rp 4.7 T | Rp 4.5 T | Rp 4.9 T | Rp 5.5 T |
| Depreciation & Amortization | Rp 7.9 T | Rp 8.6 T | Rp 8.8 T | Rp 9.7 T | Rp 10 T |
| FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash & Equivalents | Rp 3.8 T | Rp 9.5 T | Rp 5.2 T | Rp 4.5 T | Rp 5.1 T |
| Accounts Receivable | Rp 2.0 T | Rp 2.3 T | Rp 3.1 T | Rp 3.3 T | Rp 3.6 T |
| Inventory | Rp 18 M | Rp 73 M | Rp 226 M | Rp 72 M | Rp 54 M |
| Current Assets | Rp 11 T | Rp 19 T | Rp 15 T | Rp 15 T | Rp 19 T |
| Total Assets | Rp 63 T | Rp 114 T | Rp 115 T | Rp 114 T | Rp 119 T |
| Accounts Payable | Rp 982 M | Rp 850 M | Rp 746 M | Rp 912 M | Rp 1.2 T |
| Current Liabilities | Rp 29 T | Rp 36 T | Rp 34 T | Rp 31 T | Rp 30 T |
| Total Liabilities | Rp 53 T | Rp 82 T | Rp 81 T | Rp 78 T | Rp 79 T |
| Total Interest-Bearing Debt | Rp 34 T | Rp 56 T | Rp 54 T | Rp 55 T | Rp 55 T |
| Total Equity | Rp 10 T | Rp 31 T | Rp 34 T | Rp 37 T | Rp 40 T |
| Equity Attributable to Owners | Rp 9.2 T | Rp 28 T | Rp 31 T | Rp 33 T | Rp 36 T |
| FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | Rp 11 T | Rp 16 T | Rp 18 T | Rp 19 T | Rp 22 T |
| Capital Expenditure | Rp 9.4 T | Rp 10 T | Rp 12 T | Rp 13 T | Rp 12 T |
Indosat Ooredoo Hutchison (IOH) is the success case of telco consolidation. The 2022 Indosat–Hutchison (Tri) merger delivered synergies that show up right across the accounts: EBITDA margin widened 31%→37% and operating margin 12.5%→19% (FY22–25), free cash flow nearly doubled (Rp5.3tn→9.2tn), leverage came down (D/E 1.78→1.39), and ROE held steady at ~15%. As the #2 player, it benefits from a more rational three-operator market. In short it is a margin-expansion and cash-flow story, the mirror image of TLKM’s compression, with further upside as the synergies complete and data monetisation improves; the risk is the price war re-igniting.
Spectrum, base stations and backhaul are bought up front and then carry traffic for years. Capital spending ran IDR 9.4tn, 10.4tn, 11.8tn, 12.5tn and 12.4tn across FY2021 to FY2025, which is 21.9 percent of revenue in FY2025.
EconomicsSpending a fifth of revenue every year on assets that then depreciate is why the income statement understates this business. Depreciation is a real past cost but not a current cash cost, and it is the single largest reason profit and cash diverge here.
Indonesian mobile penetration is already above one connection per person, so subscriber growth is largely finished. Revenue grew from IDR 31.4tn to IDR 56.5tn between FY2021 and FY2025, but the step change came from combining two networks rather than from finding new customers.
EconomicsWith volume growth gone, the levers are price per gigabyte and cost per site. That is why operating margin rose from 12.6 percent to 19.1 percent while revenue growth slowed to 1.1 percent in FY2025: the gains came from the cost side.
Prepaid customers pay first and consume afterwards, so the working capital position is structurally favourable. The cash conversion cycle was minus 4.1, then 6.1, 14.2, 8.9 and 6.7 days.
EconomicsA near-zero cycle means growth does not consume working capital. The capital intensity in this business is entirely in the network, not in the customer.
Debt of IDR 54.9tn against equity of IDR 39.5tn funds the infrastructure, costing IDR 4.2tn of interest in FY2025. Interest cover improved from 1.32 times in FY2021 to 2.57 times.
EconomicsThis is the step most readers skip, and it is where the return actually goes. Operating profit of IDR 10.8tn becomes IDR 5.5tn of net profit largely because interest and tax take the difference, so the equity return depends on refinancing cost as much as on tariffs.
Cost structureDepreciation-led, which is the defining feature. Gross margin is high at 55.0 percent because network operating costs are modest relative to airtime revenue, yet operating margin is only 19.1 percent, and most of that 36 point gap is depreciation of assets already paid for. Below the operating line, interest of IDR 4.2tn takes a further large slice of the IDR 10.8tn operating profit. So the cost structure has two dominant items that are both consequences of past capital decisions rather than current trading, which is why cost discipline shows up slowly and capital discipline shows up for years.
Cash cycleStructurally favourable and close to zero: minus 4.1 days in FY2021, then 6.1, 14.2, 8.9 and 6.7. Prepaid customers pay before they consume, so the business is funded by its own subscribers rather than by a supply chain, which is the opposite of the credit-driven cycles at industrial names on this site. The practical consequence is that ISAT never needs working capital to grow. Every rupiah of financing it raises goes into the network, which is also why the balance sheet risk is concentrated in capital spending decisions rather than in trading conditions.
Unit economicsNet income is the wrong number for this business, and the gap is enormous rather than technical. Operating cash flow covered net income 1.63, 3.32, 3.92, 3.89 and 3.91 times across FY2021 to FY2025. In FY2025 that is IDR 21.6tn of operating cash against IDR 5.5tn of reported profit, because depreciation on a network already built is subtracted from profit but never leaves the bank. Anyone valuing ISAT on earnings is discounting roughly a quarter of the cash it actually produces. The discipline runs the other way too: of that IDR 21.6tn, capital spending consumed IDR 12.4tn, so free cash flow was about IDR 9.2tn. Judge a network operator on operating cash flow minus the capital spending needed to keep the network competitive, never on the profit line alone, and never on cash flow alone either.
Equipment vendors and spectrum (the government) carry pricing power; the larger merged scale improves IOH’s leverage.
Implication → Merger scale eases supplier costs: part of the margin-expansion story.
Price-sensitive prepaid consumers with low switching costs cap ARPU.
Implication → Limits pricing power; IOH’s margin gains came from cost synergies, not tariffs.
Spectrum, capex and the consolidated three-player structure are high barriers.
Implication → Consolidation reduced the field to three: structurally supportive of pricing discipline.
OTT apps and Wi-Fi substitute for voice/SMS and some data.
Implication → Caps the value of connectivity; IOH must climb into enterprise/digital to offset.
A three-player market (Telkomsel, IOH, XLSmart) still competes on data price.
Implication → The swing risk: a renewed price war would erode the hard-won margin gains.
Read FY2022 onward as the company and treat FY2021 as a different entity, because the merger that created the current business closed at the start of 2022 and it reset every ratio on the page. The evidence is unmistakable: revenue jumped from IDR 31.4tn to IDR 46.8tn, total equity from IDR 10.3tn to IDR 31.4tn and total assets from IDR 63.4tn to IDR 113.7tn in a single year. That is why FY2021 shows a return on equity of 73.5 percent, which is an artefact of a small pre-merger equity base rather than an operating achievement, and why FY2021 net margin of 21.5 percent EXCEEDED its operating margin of 12.6 percent, a combination only possible with a large non-operating gain. Anyone drawing a five-year trend line through those two points is measuring a corporate transaction, not performance. From FY2022 the record is consistent and clean: return on equity 16.7, 14.7, 14.7 and 15.2 percent, operating margin climbing 12.5 to 19.1 percent, and cash covering profit near four times every year with no gains propping up the result. The one genuine caution in the current numbers is that reported profit is small relative to the cash and the asset base, so it is sensitive to interest and depreciation assumptions rather than to trading.
| Period | One-off item | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| FY2022 | Network merger closed at the start of 2022 and reset the entire balance sheet | Revenue rose from IDR 31.4tn to IDR 46.8tn, total equity from IDR 10.3tn to IDR 31.4tn and total assets from IDR 63.4tn to IDR 113.7tn in one year. Every per-share, per-equity and per-asset ratio breaks across that boundary. Use FY2022 as the first comparable year and treat any five-year growth rate that starts in FY2021 as a merger measurement. |
| FY2021 | Net margin above operating margin, indicating a material non-operating gain | FY2021 net margin of 21.5 percent exceeded operating margin of 12.6 percent, and net profit of IDR 6.8tn was the highest of the five years on the lowest revenue. That combination cannot come from trading. It also means FY2021 profit is not a base from which later years declined, which is how the sequence looks if the gain is not stripped out first. |
Cash conversionExceptionally strong and the most important figure on the page: operating cash flow covered net income 1.63, 3.32, 3.92, 3.89 and 3.91 times. Free cash flow after capital spending was about IDR 9.2tn in FY2025, from IDR 21.6tn of operating cash less IDR 12.4tn of capital expenditure. The four-times conversion is not a quality signal in the way it would be at a consumer company, it is a structural feature of depreciating a network that was already paid for. Judge the business on cash after capital spending, since that is the amount actually available to service debt and reward equity.
A builder with no choice about it, which is the honest description of a network operator. Capital spending has run between IDR 9.4tn and IDR 12.5tn every year, never below 21 percent of revenue, because a mobile network that is not continuously upgraded loses customers to one that is. The encouraging part is that the spending is now funded from operations rather than from the balance sheet: debt has been broadly flat at around IDR 55tn since the merger while equity grew from IDR 31.4tn to IDR 39.5tn, so leverage fell from 178.5 percent of equity to 139.0 percent without shrinking investment.
DeploymentNearly everything goes into the network, and the discipline is visible in the ratio rather than the absolute. Capital spending was 29.9 percent of revenue in FY2021 and 21.9 percent in FY2025, so investment grew more slowly than revenue, which is what operating leverage looks like in this industry. Working capital absorbed nothing because the cycle is near zero. The remainder went to strengthening the balance sheet: cash sits at IDR 5.1tn and debt at IDR 54.9tn, roughly unchanged in absolute terms since FY2022 while operating cash flow rose from IDR 15.7tn to IDR 21.6tn, so the same debt is now covered by far more cash. Interest cover improved from 1.32 times in FY2021 to 2.57 times, which is the single clearest measure of progress here.
Returns trendReturns are stable but modest once the merger year is excluded: return on equity 16.7, 14.7, 14.7 and 15.2 percent for FY2022 to FY2025, with return on invested capital lower at 7.5, 11.1, 9.6 and 10.1 percent because the asset base is large and debt-funded. That spread between the two is leverage, exactly as at INDF on this site, and it means the equity return depends materially on the cost of refinancing IDR 54.9tn of debt. The valuation is where the capital intensity shows up as an opportunity. At IDR 1,900.16 the market capitalisation of about IDR 61.3tn sits against a forward model value of IDR 3,596.79 per share, a gap of PLUS 89.3 percent. Note a limitation of the relative check rather than hiding it: the EV/EBITDA anchor of 5.44 times is IDENTICAL to the peer median, because Indonesian telecoms has very few listed comparables and ISAT is effectively setting the median it is measured against. So the relative test is uninformative here and the case rests on the cash flow model. What that model is really asking is whether IDR 12.4tn of annual capital spending can be held while operating cash flow keeps rising, since that is the only route by which a capital-hungry network turns into shareholder value. Both figures are model outputs, not targets.
The merger that created the current business closed at the start of 2022, taking revenue from IDR 31.4tn to IDR 46.8tn, equity from IDR 10.3tn to IDR 31.4tn and assets from IDR 63.4tn to IDR 113.7tn in one year. FY2021 therefore shows a 73.5 percent return on equity and a net margin of 21.5 percent that EXCEEDS its 12.6 percent operating margin, both artefacts. Any five-year compound growth rate anchored on FY2021 is measuring a transaction. Use FY2022 as the first comparable year.
Capital expenditure ran IDR 9.4tn to IDR 12.5tn every year, between 21.9 and 29.9 percent of revenue, and it consumed IDR 12.4tn of the IDR 21.6tn operating cash flow in FY2025. A network that stops being upgraded loses customers, so this spending cannot be deferred to protect earnings for long. It is the reason a business generating four times its profit in cash still produces only mid-teens returns on equity.
Debt of IDR 54.9tn against equity of IDR 39.5tn is 139.0 percent, down from 178.5 percent after the merger but still high, and interest of IDR 4.2tn absorbs a large share of IDR 10.8tn of operating profit. Cover has improved from 1.32 times to 2.57 times, which is real progress, but at that level the refinancing rate matters as much to shareholders as tariffs do. Return on equity of 15.2 percent against return on invested capital of 10.1 percent is that leverage measured.
Revenue rose just 1.1 percent in FY2025, from IDR 55.9tn to IDR 56.5tn, and operating profit was slightly LOWER than the prior year at IDR 10.8tn. With mobile penetration already above one connection per person, the remaining levers are pricing and cost rather than subscriber additions, and the margin gain from 12.6 to 19.1 percent since FY2021 has already captured much of the post-merger efficiency. Further improvement has to come from tariffs holding, which is a market structure question.
The EV/EBITDA anchor of 5.44 times is IDENTICAL to the peer median of 5.44 times, because Indonesian telecoms has very few listed comparables and ISAT is effectively setting the median against which it is measured. A relative multiple only carries information when the comparison set is independent, so on this page it carries none. That leaves the entire valuation case resting on the cash flow model and its PLUS 89.3 percent gap, with no second opinion available to cross-check it.
Curated narrative (educational interpretation), backed by the linked sources. The figures above are deterministic. Not investment advice.
A saturated (>120% penetration), now-consolidated three-player mobile market worth ~USD14bn: competing on data value, not subscribers, with infraco (towers, data centres) the new growth layer.